Top 5 Safetips from 2016

December 21, 2016
By Jean-Grégoire Manoukian

Safetips are one of our weekly features on Enablon Insights. Every Wednesday, we share a tip or best practice that contributes to . So far we have shared almost 60 Safetips from Enablon, industry associations, professional organizations and thought leaders. Our was published on October 28, 2015, which means that 2016 was the first full year during which Safetips were published.

A total of 50 Safetips were published in 2016. In this post, we highlight the top five that deserve a second look, based on reactions from readers and Social Media, or because they are about a particularly important topic that received great attention from industry. Click on the image to get to the Safetip that you would like to read in more detail.

Basic Principles for Workplace Inspections

Inspections help to prevent incidents through the critical examination of workplaces, the identification of workplace hazards (biological, chemical, ergonomic, physical), and corrective actions that result from inspection findings. To make workplace inspections as effective as possible, it’s good to establish and abide by a set of basic principles. This Safetip includes a list of such principles that organizations can adopt.

Risk Rating for Contractor Work to be Performed

Contractor safety was a topic of many Safetips because the safety performance of contractors influences the safety performance of contracting employers. Many leading companies evaluate the risk of the work to be performed by contractors. Contractors are then placed in a predetermined risk category, and each risk category may require contractors to take additional steps regarding their safety procedures and programs.

Lagging Indicators Leading Indicators

The topic of leading indicators is a very popular one among safety professionals, which is why it was prominently featured in many Safetips. Leading indicators help to determine if an organization is on a path of continuous improvement, and whether it is being proactive in safety to prevent future incidents. Lagging indicators, which measure what has already happened, can be used to evaluate leading indicators. It’s helpful to compare leading indicators to lagging indicators to determine their effectiveness, and see whether they’re driving the right behavior and improving safety.

Near Miss Reporting Leading Indicator

Staying with the topic of leading indicators, near miss reporting is a great leading indicator for many reasons. First, a near miss reporting program can be launched within a reasonable amount of time and effort. Second, near misses can help to identify hazards that can create risks for accidents. And finally, near miss reporting is already used as a leading indicator by a large number of organizations.

Root Cause Analysis

Factors that contributed to an incident must be determined during an investigation. But organizations should go beyond the minimum investigation required and conduct a root cause analysis, which helps to identify underlying or systemic causes of an incident, rather than generalized or immediate ones. By addressing root causes identified during a root cause analysis, organizations are better able to prevent similar incidents in the future.

The next Safetip will be published on Wednesday January 4, 2017. Until then, Happy Holidays!

Download the Verdantix Green Quadrant EHS Software 2019 report and learn more about the 23 most prominent EHS software vendors:

Green Quadrant EHS Software 2019